Best Known (31, 89, s)-Nets in Base 16
(31, 89, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (31, 89, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 89, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(31, 89, 120)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(31, 89, 120)-net in base 16, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on (31, 100, 120)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 80, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 80, 120)-net over F32, using
(31, 89, 168)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (31, 89, 168)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 167)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 31 and N(F) ≥ 168, using
(31, 89, 3842)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (31, 89, 3843)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 147097 311336 219835 289730 919557 903686 482714 461705 901201 798579 635452 619757 211432 256303 985437 668102 370071 165056 > 1689 [i]