Best Known (36, 89, s)-Nets in Base 16
(36, 89, 110)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 89, 110)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (4, 30, 45)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 44)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 45, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 44)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (6, 59, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (4, 30, 45)-net over F16, using
(36, 89, 128)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(36, 89, 128)-net in base 16, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (36, 93, 128)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 62, 128)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 62, 128)-net over F64, using
(36, 89, 193)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (36, 89, 193)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 89, 193)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 192)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 193, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 192)-sequence over F16, using
(36, 89, 8354)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 89, 8355)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (36, 88, 8355)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 9174 301994 430587 159571 435541 908800 353974 739133 563535 574114 435751 493926 027241 611771 747589 244545 776400 574076 > 1688 [i]