Best Known (57, 90, s)-Nets in Base 16
(57, 90, 581)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (57, 90, 581)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 22, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (35, 68, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 34, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 34, 258)-net over F256, using
- digital (6, 22, 65)-net over F16, using
(57, 90, 2093)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (57, 90, 2093)-net over F16, using
(57, 90, 2261326)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (57, 90, 2261327)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (57, 89, 2261327)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 146784 692111 154131 572319 986268 354427 048519 699032 552745 814496 319527 526072 223277 607641 581996 430039 102104 106356 > 1689 [i]