Best Known (64, 92, s)-Nets in Base 16
(64, 92, 1036)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (64, 92, 1036)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (18, 32, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 16, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 16, 259)-net over F256, using
- digital (32, 60, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 30, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 30, 259)-net over F256, using
- digital (18, 32, 518)-net over F16, using
(64, 92, 9244)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (64, 92, 9244)-net over F16, using
(64, 92, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (64, 92, large)-net in base 16, because
- 26 times m-reduction [i] would yield (64, 66, large)-net in base 16, but