Best Known (50, 93, s)-Nets in Base 16
(50, 93, 520)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (50, 93, 520)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (50, 94, 520)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 47, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 47, 260)-net over F256, using
(50, 93, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (50, 93, 642)-net over F16, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (50, 96, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 48, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 48, 321)-net over F256, using
(50, 93, 109030)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (50, 93, 109031)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (50, 92, 109031)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 601 278864 019512 341123 009920 731013 496822 026198 244680 856740 245474 624077 117348 563267 153815 750723 008311 653326 794516 > 1692 [i]