Best Known (27, 95, s)-Nets in Base 16
(27, 95, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (27, 95, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 95, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(27, 95, 98)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(27, 95, 98)-net in base 16, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (27, 100, 98)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 80, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 80, 98)-net over F32, using
(27, 95, 156)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (27, 95, 156)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 155)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 27 and N(F) ≥ 156, using
(27, 95, 2069)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (27, 95, 2070)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 2 471147 335265 317226 754563 935430 837714 728984 804393 648308 548740 215746 744270 975760 362915 043604 515780 914128 596788 008576 > 1695 [i]