Best Known (50, 95, s)-Nets in Base 16
(50, 95, 518)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (50, 95, 518)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (50, 96, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 48, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 48, 259)-net over F256, using
(50, 95, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (50, 95, 642)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (50, 96, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 48, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 48, 321)-net over F256, using
(50, 95, 84251)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (50, 95, 84252)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (50, 94, 84252)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 153944 027318 923625 446225 366131 733655 885477 837422 405588 850044 577552 260401 530306 984442 620178 701912 822902 909544 286586 > 1694 [i]