Best Known (30, 96, s)-Nets in Base 16
(30, 96, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 96, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 96, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(30, 96, 104)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(30, 96, 104)-net in base 16, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on (30, 105, 104)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 84, 104)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 84, 104)-net over F32, using
(30, 96, 162)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (30, 96, 162)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (30, 161)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 30 and N(F) ≥ 162, using
(30, 96, 2775)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 96, 2776)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 39 689088 478444 056277 381924 013133 509023 596611 176541 984335 966511 894123 281009 179850 930044 524208 838694 649625 828432 065046 > 1696 [i]