Best Known (70, 97, s)-Nets in Base 16
(70, 97, 1285)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (70, 97, 1285)-net over F16, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (8, 17, 257)-net over F16, using
- base reduction for projective spaces (embedding PG(8,256) in PG(16,16)) for nets [i] based on digital (0, 9, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- base reduction for projective spaces (embedding PG(8,256) in PG(16,16)) for nets [i] based on digital (0, 9, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (13, 26, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 13, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 13, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (27, 54, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 27, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 27, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (8, 17, 257)-net over F16, using
(70, 97, 21865)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (70, 97, 21865)-net over F16, using
(70, 97, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (70, 97, large)-net in base 16, because
- 25 times m-reduction [i] would yield (70, 72, large)-net in base 16, but