Best Known (149−10, 149, s)-Nets in Base 2
(149−10, 149, 4194321)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (139, 149, 4194321)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 10, 20)-net over F2, using
- digital (129, 139, 4194301)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (129, 140, 4194301)-net over F2, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2140, 4194301, F2, 15, 11) (dual of [(4194301, 15), 62914375, 12]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OOA(2140, large, F2, 3, 11), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2140, 4194301, F2, 15, 11) (dual of [(4194301, 15), 62914375, 12]-NRT-code), using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (129, 140, 4194301)-net over F2, using
(149−10, 149, large)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (139, 149, large)-net over F2, using
- 29 times duplication [i] based on digital (130, 140, large)-net over F2, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(2140, large, F2, 3, 10), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(2140, large, F2, 3, 11), using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(2140, large, F2, 3, 10), using
(149−10, 149, large)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (139, 149, large)-net in base 2, because
- 8 times m-reduction [i] would yield (139, 141, large)-net in base 2, but