Best Known (255−100, 255, s)-Nets in Base 2
(255−100, 255, 78)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (155, 255, 78)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (51, 101, 36)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (51, 35)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41, N(F) = 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 3 places with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (51, 35)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 154, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (51, 101, 36)-net over F2, using
(255−100, 255, 84)-Net in Base 2 — Constructive
(155, 255, 84)-net in base 2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (155, 256, 84)-net in base 2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (27, 128, 42)-net in base 4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (27, 41)-sequence in base 4, using
- base expansion [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- base expansion [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (27, 41)-sequence in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (27, 128, 42)-net in base 4, using
(255−100, 255, 119)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (155, 255, 119)-net over F2, using
(255−100, 255, 597)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (155, 255, 598)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 61033 023845 290266 318236 224485 680062 857262 253055 369861 957226 677930 560761 165524 > 2255 [i]