Best Known (223−102, 223, s)-Nets in Base 2
(223−102, 223, 59)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (121, 223, 59)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (121, 225, 59)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 67, 17)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 16)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 17, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 16)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 158, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (15, 67, 17)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(223−102, 223, 80)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (121, 223, 80)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (121, 79)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 121 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
(223−102, 223, 265)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (121, 223, 266)-net in base 2, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(2223, 266, S2, 102), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 7696 993027 830529 825591 180052 275706 499308 043173 051648 348201 768483 825054 629863 882752 / 565 467550 305957 > 2223 [i]