Best Known (230−102, 230, s)-Nets in Base 2
(230−102, 230, 63)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (128, 230, 63)-net over F2, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (128, 234, 63)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 74, 21)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 21, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 160, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (21, 74, 21)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(230−102, 230, 82)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (128, 230, 82)-net over F2, using
(230−102, 230, 297)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (128, 230, 298)-net in base 2, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(2230, 298, S2, 102), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 28328 912148 849580 959168 649431 841394 936395 688011 110123 504172 235246 501853 118396 831712 245536 784384 / 14 303044 917261 608852 030375 > 2230 [i]