Best Known (248−102, 248, s)-Nets in Base 2
(248−102, 248, 75)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (146, 248, 75)-net over F2, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (146, 252, 75)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 92, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 160, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 92, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(248−102, 248, 104)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (146, 248, 104)-net over F2, using
(248−102, 248, 505)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (146, 248, 506)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 454 245976 886141 140665 546928 707111 736783 145370 527144 600657 042497 671429 285248 > 2248 [i]