MinT - Best Known (249−103, 249, s)-Nets in Base 2

Best Known (249−103, 249, s)-Nets in Base 2

(249−103, 249, 75)-Net over F₂ — Constructive and digital

Digital (146, 249, 75)-net over F₂, using

3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (146, 252, 75)-net over F₂, using
- (u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
  1. digital (39, 92, 33)-net over F₂, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F₂, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂ with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
        an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
  2. digital (54, 160, 42)-net over F₂, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F₂, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂ with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
        an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

(249−103, 249, 103)-Net over F₂ — Digital

Digital (146, 249, 103)-net over F₂, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(249−103, 249, 505)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s

There is no (146, 249, 506)-net in base 2, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (146, 248, 506)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2^mÂ â‰¥ 454 245976 886141 140665 546928 707111 736783 145370 527144 600657 042497 671429 285248 > 2²⁴⁸ [i]