Best Known (235−104, 235, s)-Nets in Base 2
(235−104, 235, 66)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (131, 235, 66)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (131, 237, 66)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 92, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 145, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2 (see above)
- digital (39, 92, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(235−104, 235, 84)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (131, 235, 84)-net over F2, using
(235−104, 235, 391)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (131, 235, 392)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 56975 901506 188306 863736 653968 437946 292373 402502 486533 497914 578888 336872 > 2235 [i]