Best Known (145, 145+104, s)-Nets in Base 2
(145, 145+104, 75)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (145, 249, 75)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 91, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 158, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 91, 33)-net over F2, using
(145, 145+104, 101)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (145, 249, 101)-net over F2, using
(145, 145+104, 486)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (145, 249, 487)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 991 867368 077130 041346 089177 226564 313230 762528 214685 024973 934361 079572 421628 > 2249 [i]