Best Known (255−105, 255, s)-Nets in Base 2
(255−105, 255, 76)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (150, 255, 76)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 91, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (59, 164, 43)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54, N(F) = 42, and 1 place with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 91, 33)-net over F2, using
(255−105, 255, 106)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (150, 255, 106)-net over F2, using
(255−105, 255, 524)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (150, 255, 525)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (150, 254, 525)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 30874 132990 541171 688551 917680 172433 566484 587302 608841 896836 422660 845828 699424 > 2254 [i]