Best Known (256−105, 256, s)-Nets in Base 2
(256−105, 256, 76)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (151, 256, 76)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (45, 97, 34)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 33)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41, N(F) = 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 1 place with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 33)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 159, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (45, 97, 34)-net over F2, using
(256−105, 256, 108)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (151, 256, 108)-net over F2, using
(256−105, 256, 532)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (151, 256, 533)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (151, 255, 533)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 61885 598432 119992 707945 327634 835032 461841 310398 164936 451545 139790 847613 162384 > 2255 [i]