Best Known (138, 138+106, s)-Nets in Base 2
(138, 138+106, 67)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (138, 244, 67)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (138, 246, 67)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 93, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (45, 153, 34)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 33)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41, N(F) = 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 1 place with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 33)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 93, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(138, 138+106, 91)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (138, 244, 91)-net over F2, using
(138, 138+106, 427)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (138, 244, 428)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 31 274017 123844 125734 112697 649033 409715 681359 866936 869240 232928 701494 979824 > 2244 [i]