Best Known (253−108, 253, s)-Nets in Base 2
(253−108, 253, 70)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (145, 253, 70)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 75, 21)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 21, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (70, 178, 49)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (70, 48)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (70, 48)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (21, 75, 21)-net over F2, using
(253−108, 253, 97)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (145, 253, 97)-net over F2, using
(253−108, 253, 464)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (145, 253, 465)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 16005 974646 864313 339947 661273 162883 031043 791252 513483 924698 927312 133921 414304 > 2253 [i]