Best Known (248−111, 248, s)-Nets in Base 2
(248−111, 248, 66)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (137, 248, 66)-net over F2, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (137, 255, 66)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 98, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 157, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2 (see above)
- digital (39, 98, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(248−111, 248, 86)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (137, 248, 86)-net over F2, using
(248−111, 248, 403)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (137, 248, 404)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (137, 247, 404)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 235 116586 893264 933751 015030 115459 927170 469697 000748 466901 998109 849692 366496 > 2247 [i]