Best Known (199−113, 199, s)-Nets in Base 2
(199−113, 199, 52)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (86, 199, 52)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (85, 199, 52)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (85, 51)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, 1 place with degree 2, and 3 places with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (85, 51)-sequence over F2, using
(199−113, 199, 57)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (86, 199, 57)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (83, 199, 57)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (83, 56)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 83 and N(F) ≥ 57, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (83, 56)-sequence over F2, using
(199−113, 199, 179)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (86, 199, 180)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (86, 198, 180)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 501528 748533 529255 089189 433654 948628 542681 312556 224565 780176 > 2198 [i]