Best Known (236−113, 236, s)-Nets in Base 2
(236−113, 236, 57)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (123, 236, 57)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (110, 236, 57)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (110, 56)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, 1 place with degree 2, and 8 places with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (110, 56)-sequence over F2, using
(236−113, 236, 80)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (123, 236, 80)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (121, 236, 80)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (121, 79)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 121 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (121, 79)-sequence over F2, using
(236−113, 236, 262)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (123, 236, 263)-net in base 2, because
- 3 times m-reduction [i] would yield (123, 233, 263)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(2233, 263, S2, 110), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 208 361079 889821 744668 890387 660731 037374 858559 867656 192612 204735 454426 713127 124992 / 13955 210325 > 2233 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(2233, 263, S2, 110), but