Best Known (140, 140+113, s)-Nets in Base 2
(140, 140+113, 67)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (140, 253, 67)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 95, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (45, 158, 34)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 33)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41, N(F) = 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 1 place with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 33)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 95, 33)-net over F2, using
(140, 140+113, 88)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (140, 253, 88)-net over F2, using
(140, 140+113, 413)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (140, 253, 414)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (140, 252, 414)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7520 295480 617470 983144 036988 852245 741980 112528 695082 897723 279125 250099 358900 > 2252 [i]