MinT - Best Known (118, 118+120, s)-Nets in Base 2

Best Known (118, 118+120, s)-Nets in Base 2

Digital (118, 238, 57)-net over F₂, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (110, 238, 57)-net over F₂, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (110, 56)-sequence over F₂, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ III based on the algebraic function field F/F₂ with g(F)Â =Â 69, N(F)Â =Â 48, 1 place with degree 2, and 8 places with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F₂ with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

Digital (118, 238, 73)-net over F₂, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (114, 238, 73)-net over F₂, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (114, 72)-sequence over F₂, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂ with g(F) = 114 and N(F) ≥ 73, using
    - Drinfeld modules of rank 1 [i]

There is no digital (118, 238, 248)-net over F₂, because

extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(2²³⁸, 248, F₂, 120) (dual of [248, 10, 121]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(2¹¹⁸, 127, F₂, 60) (dual of [127, 9, 61]-code), but
  - residual code [i] would yield linear OA(2⁵⁸, 66, F₂, 30) (dual of [66, 8, 31]-code), but
    - adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(2⁵⁹, 67, F₂, 31) (dual of [67, 8, 32]-code), but
      - â€œDHMâ€ bound on codes from Brouwerâ€™s database [i]

There is no (118, 238, 251)-net in base 2, because

12 times m-reduction [i] would yield (118, 226, 251)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(2²²⁶, 251, S₂, 108), but
  - the linear programming bound shows that MÂ â‰¥ 3 068587 541377 441989 862758 184092 770418 630025 105253 803106 088322 664550 769029 545984 / 21915 413575 > 2²²⁶ [i]