Best Known (43, 43+13, s)-Nets in Base 2
(43, 43+13, 96)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (43, 56, 96)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 14, 24)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
(43, 43+13, 178)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (43, 56, 178)-net over F2, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(256, 178, F2, 2, 13) (dual of [(178, 2), 300, 14]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(256, 261, F2, 2, 13) (dual of [(261, 2), 466, 14]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(256, 522, F2, 13) (dual of [522, 466, 14]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(12) ⊂ Ce(10) [i] based on
- linear OA(255, 512, F2, 13) (dual of [512, 457, 14]-code), using an extension Ce(12) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 511 = 29−1, defining interval I = [1,12], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 13 [i]
- linear OA(246, 512, F2, 11) (dual of [512, 466, 12]-code), using an extension Ce(10) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 511 = 29−1, defining interval I = [1,10], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 11 [i]
- linear OA(21, 10, F2, 1) (dual of [10, 9, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(21, s, F2, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(12) ⊂ Ce(10) [i] based on
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(256, 522, F2, 13) (dual of [522, 466, 14]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(256, 261, F2, 2, 13) (dual of [(261, 2), 466, 14]-NRT-code), using
(43, 43+13, 1712)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (43, 56, 1713)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (43, 55, 1713)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 36147 816264 505096 > 255 [i]