Best Known (104, 104+137, s)-Nets in Base 2
(104, 104+137, 55)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (104, 241, 55)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (100, 241, 55)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (100, 54)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, 1 place with degree 2, and 6 places with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (100, 54)-sequence over F2, using
(104, 104+137, 65)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (104, 241, 65)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (95, 241, 65)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (95, 64)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 95 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (95, 64)-sequence over F2, using
(104, 104+137, 213)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (104, 241, 214)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (104, 240, 214)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 869850 138652 956592 594605 422517 091101 113807 980149 141754 203779 786985 417331 > 2240 [i]