Best Known (225−143, 225, s)-Nets in Base 2
(225−143, 225, 51)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (82, 225, 51)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (80, 225, 51)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (80, 50)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, 1 place with degree 2, and 2 places with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (80, 50)-sequence over F2, using
(225−143, 225, 56)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (82, 225, 56)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (80, 225, 56)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (80, 55)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 80 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (80, 55)-sequence over F2, using
(225−143, 225, 154)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (82, 225, 155)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (82, 224, 155)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 35 572529 647978 648762 843696 636768 828630 701477 648751 781078 391402 628808 > 2224 [i]