Best Known (53, 53+143, s)-Nets in Base 2
(53, 53+143, 36)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (53, 196, 36)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (51, 196, 36)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (51, 35)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41, N(F) = 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 3 places with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (51, 35)-sequence over F2, using
(53, 53+143, 40)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (53, 196, 40)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (50, 196, 40)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 39)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 40, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 39)-sequence over F2, using
(53, 53+143, 79)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (53, 196, 80)-net in base 2, because
- 43 times m-reduction [i] would yield (53, 153, 80)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2153, 80, S2, 2, 100), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 1 461501 637330 902918 203684 832716 283019 655932 542976 / 101 > 2153 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2153, 80, S2, 2, 100), but