Best Known (106, 106+149, s)-Nets in Base 2
(106, 106+149, 56)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (106, 255, 56)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (105, 255, 56)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (105, 55)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, 1 place with degree 2, and 7 places with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (105, 55)-sequence over F2, using
(106, 106+149, 65)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (106, 255, 65)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (95, 255, 65)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (95, 64)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 95 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (95, 64)-sequence over F2, using
(106, 106+149, 211)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (106, 255, 212)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (106, 254, 212)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 35613 712128 496597 971315 562473 024824 083124 625318 025310 971901 630680 702624 027918 > 2254 [i]