Best Known (49, 49+150, s)-Nets in Base 2
(49, 49+150, 35)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (49, 199, 35)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (48, 199, 35)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 34)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41, N(F) = 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 2 places with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 34)-sequence over F2, using
(49, 49+150, 36)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (49, 199, 36)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (47, 199, 36)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (47, 35)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 47 and N(F) ≥ 36, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (47, 35)-sequence over F2, using
(49, 49+150, 64)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (49, 199, 65)-net in base 2, because
- 13 times m-reduction [i] would yield (49, 186, 65)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2186, 65, S2, 3, 137), but
- the LP bound with quadratic polynomials shows that M ≥ 25108 406941 546723 055343 157692 830665 664409 421777 856138 051584 / 207 > 2186 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2186, 65, S2, 3, 137), but