Best Known (259−155, 259, s)-Nets in Base 2
(259−155, 259, 55)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (104, 259, 55)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (100, 259, 55)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (100, 54)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, 1 place with degree 2, and 6 places with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (100, 54)-sequence over F2, using
(259−155, 259, 65)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (104, 259, 65)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (95, 259, 65)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (95, 64)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 95 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (95, 64)-sequence over F2, using
(259−155, 259, 202)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (104, 259, 203)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (104, 258, 203)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 522724 788968 242515 166683 926035 797339 142345 307328 234247 396738 639982 179175 342544 > 2258 [i]