Best Known (249−161, 249, s)-Nets in Base 2
(249−161, 249, 52)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (88, 249, 52)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (85, 249, 52)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (85, 51)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, 1 place with degree 2, and 3 places with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (85, 51)-sequence over F2, using
(249−161, 249, 57)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (88, 249, 57)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (83, 249, 57)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (83, 56)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 83 and N(F) ≥ 57, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (83, 56)-sequence over F2, using
(249−161, 249, 127)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (88, 249, 128)-net in base 2, because
- 2 times m-reduction [i] would yield (88, 247, 128)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2247, 128, S2, 2, 159), but
- the LP bound with quadratic polynomials shows that M ≥ 1243 860333 603982 568026 641440 523014 635142 548663 400435 746517 610765 710004 322304 / 5 > 2247 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2247, 128, S2, 2, 159), but