Best Known (96, 96+162, s)-Nets in Base 2
(96, 96+162, 54)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 258, 54)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (95, 258, 54)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (95, 53)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, 1 place with degree 2, and 5 places with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (95, 53)-sequence over F2, using
(96, 96+162, 65)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (96, 258, 65)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (95, 258, 65)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (95, 64)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 95 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (95, 64)-sequence over F2, using
(96, 96+162, 180)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 258, 181)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 609707 746614 076504 028598 383977 499305 578093 242230 555745 768585 009890 566969 088948 > 2258 [i]