Best Known (195−168, 195, s)-Nets in Base 2
(195−168, 195, 21)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (27, 195, 21)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 195, 21)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 21, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
(195−168, 195, 24)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (27, 195, 24)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (25, 195, 24)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (25, 23)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 25 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (25, 23)-sequence over F2, using
(195−168, 195, 35)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (27, 195, 36)-net in base 2, because
- 24 times m-reduction [i] would yield (27, 171, 36)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2171, 36, S2, 5, 144), but
- the LP bound with quadratic polynomials shows that M ≥ 2 351123 529980 772848 125940 605130 015358 852577 305615 663104 / 725 > 2171 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2171, 36, S2, 5, 144), but