Best Known (238−195, 238, s)-Nets in Base 2
(238−195, 238, 33)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (43, 238, 33)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (39, 238, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
(238−195, 238, 34)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (43, 238, 34)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (43, 33)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 43 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
(238−195, 238, 53)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (43, 238, 54)-net in base 2, because
- 29 times m-reduction [i] would yield (43, 209, 54)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2209, 54, S2, 4, 166), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 171132 473961 405428 384116 794985 964452 518204 530025 892305 788255 338496 / 167 > 2209 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2209, 54, S2, 4, 166), but