Best Known (26, 26+225, s)-Nets in Base 2
(26, 26+225, 21)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 251, 21)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 251, 21)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 21, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
(26, 26+225, 24)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (26, 251, 24)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (25, 251, 24)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (25, 23)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 25 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (25, 23)-sequence over F2, using
(26, 26+225, 33)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 251, 34)-net in base 2, because
- 54 times m-reduction [i] would yield (26, 197, 34)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2197, 34, S2, 6, 171), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 9 440761 010021 567868 809027 292504 330289 817942 588473 907907 395584 / 43 > 2197 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2197, 34, S2, 6, 171), but