Best Known (53−25, 53, s)-Nets in Base 2
(53−25, 53, 23)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (28, 53, 23)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 19, 11)-net over F2, using
- digital (9, 34, 12)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 11)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 12, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 11)-sequence over F2, using
(53−25, 53, 25)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (28, 53, 25)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 24)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 25, using
(53−25, 53, 87)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (28, 53, 88)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (28, 52, 88)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(252, 88, S2, 24), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 2 587715 521886 450011 810360 721408 / 536 605819 945767 > 252 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(252, 88, S2, 24), but