Best Known (29, 29+25, s)-Nets in Base 2
(29, 29+25, 24)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 54, 24)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (8, 20, 13)-net over F2, using
- digital (9, 34, 12)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 11)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 12, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 11)-sequence over F2, using
(29, 29+25, 25)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (29, 54, 25)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (28, 54, 25)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 24)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 24)-sequence over F2, using
(29, 29+25, 95)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 54, 96)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 53, 96)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(253, 96, S2, 24), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 429 789847 275667 421186 486526 017536 / 46352 741187 624885 > 253 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(253, 96, S2, 24), but