Best Known (39, 39+27, s)-Nets in Base 2
(39, 39+27, 34)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (39, 66, 34)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (39, 68, 34)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 34, 17)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 16)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 17, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 16)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 34, 17)-net over F4, using
(39, 39+27, 40)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (39, 66, 40)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 33, 20)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 19)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 20, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 19)-sequence over F4, using
(39, 39+27, 163)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (39, 66, 164)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (39, 65, 164)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 39 027882 257375 055864 > 265 [i]