Best Known (50, 50+31, s)-Nets in Base 2
(50, 50+31, 44)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (50, 81, 44)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (50, 82, 44)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 41, 22)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 21)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 22, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 21)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 41, 22)-net over F4, using
(50, 50+31, 52)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (50, 81, 52)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (50, 82, 52)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 41, 26)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 25)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 26, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 25)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 41, 26)-net over F4, using
(50, 50+31, 237)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (50, 81, 238)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (50, 80, 238)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 224083 489080 943709 929948 > 280 [i]