Best Known (51, 51+32, s)-Nets in Base 2
(51, 51+32, 44)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (51, 83, 44)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (51, 84, 44)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 42, 22)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 21)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 22, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 21)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 42, 22)-net over F4, using
(51, 51+32, 52)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (51, 83, 52)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (51, 84, 52)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 42, 26)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 25)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 26, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 25)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 42, 26)-net over F4, using
(51, 51+32, 225)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (51, 83, 226)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 10 133665 261662 466901 339226 > 283 [i]