Best Known (99, 99+35, s)-Nets in Base 2
(99, 99+35, 135)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (99, 134, 135)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (99, 135, 135)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 45, 45)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 44)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 45, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 44)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 45, 45)-net over F8, using
(99, 99+35, 182)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (99, 134, 182)-net over F2, using
(99, 99+35, 1600)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (99, 134, 1601)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (99, 133, 1601)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 10894 176306 387477 892028 753741 759431 479352 > 2133 [i]