Best Known (200−38, 200, s)-Nets in Base 2
(200−38, 200, 269)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (162, 200, 269)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 24, 9)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 8)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 8)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (138, 176, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 44, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 44, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (5, 24, 9)-net over F2, using
(200−38, 200, 613)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (162, 200, 613)-net over F2, using
(200−38, 200, 11665)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (162, 200, 11666)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 607616 916336 456758 503293 541361 946138 986375 768133 911320 081748 > 2200 [i]