Best Known (171−40, 171, s)-Nets in Base 2
(171−40, 171, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (131, 171, 195)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (130, 171, 195)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (130, 174, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 58, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 58, 65)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (130, 174, 195)-net over F2, using
(171−40, 171, 292)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (131, 171, 292)-net over F2, using
(171−40, 171, 3083)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (131, 171, 3084)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3009 534527 890750 003253 571366 078176 441238 080127 626368 > 2171 [i]