Best Known (142, 142+40, s)-Nets in Base 2
(142, 142+40, 198)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (142, 182, 198)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 20, 3)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 2)-sequence over F2, using
- Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 3, using
- the rational function field F2(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- Sobol sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 2)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (122, 162, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 54, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 54, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (0, 20, 3)-net over F2, using
(142, 142+40, 364)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (142, 182, 364)-net over F2, using
(142, 142+40, 4527)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (142, 182, 4528)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6 141064 925011 809691 261353 757640 267562 898884 994471 214266 > 2182 [i]