Best Known (129−41, 129, s)-Nets in Base 2
(129−41, 129, 68)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (88, 129, 68)-net over F2, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (88, 134, 68)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 67, 34)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- T5 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 67, 34)-net over F4, using
(129−41, 129, 109)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (88, 129, 109)-net over F2, using
(129−41, 129, 672)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (88, 129, 673)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (88, 128, 673)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 346 719284 056149 367034 485213 412223 156616 > 2128 [i]