Best Known (68, 68+41, s)-Nets in Base 2
(68, 68+41, 60)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (68, 109, 60)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (68, 110, 60)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 55, 30)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 55, 30)-net over F4, using
(68, 68+41, 66)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (68, 109, 66)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (68, 110, 66)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 55, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 55, 33)-net over F4, using
(68, 68+41, 322)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (68, 109, 323)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (68, 108, 323)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 339 211203 045411 721437 645862 503536 > 2108 [i]