Best Known (205−43, 205, s)-Nets in Base 2
(205−43, 205, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (162, 205, 260)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (162, 208, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 52, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 52, 65)-net over F16, using
(205−43, 205, 459)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (162, 205, 459)-net over F2, using
(205−43, 205, 7260)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (162, 205, 7261)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (162, 204, 7261)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 25 784632 852954 053065 824391 394042 888614 074536 863288 029065 633178 > 2204 [i]